Intellectual Property Rights Holders Association Blog

We approached top removal specialist firm RemoveYourContent.com about their perception of the online market with respect to infringement. They were kind enough to stop sending DMCAs for just long enough to answer a few of our questions.

In your travels, would you say that copyright infringement is becoming a more pervasive problem?

I think that it’s not more pervasive… rather more organized and user-friendly. Back in the early days of the net… Usenet and IRC were pretty much common place for folks wishing to exchange pirated media. Nowadays, you can find that same level of piracy, but now on the web and you don’t need any knowledge related to IRC clients or Usenet newsreaders to access it.

Would you say that the degree of expertise required to acquire infringed  materials decreasing?

Most definitely decreasing. The explosion of free file hosting server farms make downloading media as simple as clicking your mouse.

Besides your services, what other means of intellectual property rights control do you think content owners should exercise?

Content producers need to start suing copyright infringers (of their media) and holding people accountable for their actions. Internet piracy has become the equivalent to “jay walking”. The crazy thing about this whole process is that each copyright infringement is a violation of FEDERAL law, if one resides within the United States. Robbing a bank is a federal offense (here in the United States) and investigated by the FBI. The same could be said about copyright infringement, however, the government fails to see the tangible losses.. thus they do next to nothing in enforcement.

Do you think penalizing the end-user for doing the uploading is an effective  strategy?

There’s a place for people who violate laws. It’s called jail or the penitentiary. If someone goes into convenience store,
shoplifts and is caught.. they go to jail. What’s happening online is tantamount to that very same crime.. yet nobody is “penalized”. There’s something very wrong with that.

Are there any sites that seem to accommodate you removing infringed material as a part of their expected business plan?

Answer related to pirated sites:
Not to my knowledge. We work with a lot of “pirate” sites directly.. to get client content down faster than just bombarding the host with Dmca notices. It’s not because we like what’s going on, it simply more efficient for everyone involved, except for the uploader that is.

Answer related to clients:
We now keep our client site list confidential. I can say that we do work for approximately 67 producers worldwide.. including online mainstream, reality, hentai, sologirl, gay, shemale and fetish.. as well as a large portfolio of DVD lines.

Do you notify the advertisers that appear on a page containing infringing  material?

Not anymore. We changed out terms of service to specifically
include that verbiage as well.

If so, do they respond? How?

Most, non-content producers do not respond or take any action against copyright infringement sites.

Do you feel removal requests received by infringers from your company tend to receive more attention than a similar request from a lesser known organization?

Honestly, I’m not sure. I would hope they would address every infringement notice they receive as equal. We’ve had our notices made public on more occasions then I can recall. Maybe that’s why.

What is the biggest trend in infringement that no one is talking about?

Affiliate infringement

 

We appreciate RemoveYourContent.com taking their time to speak with us about this issue. We look forward to speaking with them again about their ongoing endeavors.

In a federal ruling, GEMA won a small victory against file hosting company Rapid Share. The company argues that it already employs MD5 checking to prevent files that were previously reported from being uploaded again. AVN reports,AVN:Court Rules RapidShare Must Eliminate Infringing Content More Efficiently, that the German Government wasn’t buying it, and needs them to do more:

 a German court has ruled that RapidShare’s efforts to fight piracy are lacking. The Hamburg district court’s decision states that RapidShare must take action against infringing content the moment copyright holders make the company aware it…

In addition to quickly taking down copyrighted content, Rapidshare also has to “proactively check content before publishing it.”

RapidShare employs a MD5 filter to prevent the upload of previously removed content, but the court’s ruling says infringers need only to alter a few bytes of a file in order to evade the filter.

German courts have ruled several times in the favor of content owners, and may be one of the more favorable court systems in the world for people holding claim to intellectual property rights.